Rings

2017

Drama / Horror

33
IMDb Rating 4.5

Synopsis


Downloaded 14037 times
4/20/2017 3:21:04 AM

1080p 720p
1.95G
1920x1080
Normal
English
23.976 (23976/1000) fps /
102 min
P/S 4 / 7
1.24G
1280x720
Normal
English
23.976 (23976/1000) fps /
102 min
P/S 3 / 12

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by view_and_review 2/10

Sequels are watched based upon the strength of their predecessors. Itis known that most sequels aren&#x27;t as good but sometimes the firstinstallment was so good that the sequel can never live up to it and nordoes it have to to be appreciated. The Ring was the scariest movie I&#x27;dseen in 20 years. I remember being genuinely spooked when watching thatmovie. Part two wasn&#x27;t as good but it was watchable. Rings, on theother hand, was trash.<br><br>We all know the premise by now: watch the video, get a phone call andthen you have seven days to live. We all know who Samara is and we allknow what she does to her victims, so that avenue is cutoff as far asgenerating scares. Where do you go from there then if you want to tryto cash in on the Samara craze one more time? <br><br>In Rings a professor discovers the Samara video and watches it. He alsofinds out that in order to stop the impending death all he has to do isrecord it and have someone else watch it. He then decides to turn thisinto an experiment in order to answer some elusive metaphysicalquestions. He ensures that all of his subjects are able to shake theSamara curse by recording the video and having another person watch it.Of course this would be a never ending chain of video watching butwhatever. In steps the main characters, two lovebirds that are primescary movie age (18-25).<br><br>The writers completely mailed this one in. There was no real thoughtgiven to how they would revive the Samara story. There was nolegitimate path for the main character, Julia (Matilda Lutz), to beinserted into this movie yet the writers clumsily shoe horned her inthere; which meant I had to be assaulted by her poor acting the entiremovie. In fact, I&#x27;d say that was the scariest thing: her acting.<br><br>With no fresh and innovative means to scare its audience the directorrelied on cheap jump scares: suddenly opening umbrella, barking dog,truck horn, breaking glass, etc. Not one of these lousy attempts atspooking the viewer even managed to register a single uptick in heartrate. This movie was lame from the word &#x22;go&#x22;.<br><br>They did attempt to legitimize the movie by casting actors such as TheBig Bang Theory&#x27;s Johnny Galecki and veteran actor Vincent D&#x27;Onofriobut their talents were wasted. This movie was an abysmal failure andeven though Samara may not be dead and gone this franchise certainlyis.

Read More
Reviewed by Hunter Avallone 1/10

Me and my girlfriend went to see this together, expecting it to be bad.We are both big horror movie fans. I loved Friday the 13th, Hellraiser,and I seriously enjoyed the new Ouija movie also. (so did mygirlfriend) anyway we went to the theater expecting a &#x22;meh&#x22; and mostlybad movie, but this was just HORRIBLE. The acting was beyond cringe,and we had more fun laughing and making fun of the movie then we didactually watching the movie. Nothing made sense and it felt like theywere making it up as they went. It was not even slightly scary, longand boring, bad acting, horrible plot, and pointless things happeningthat had no connection. It also basically just re told the first storyas well. I do not recommend wasting your money on this horrible movie.

Read More
Reviewed by bkrauser-81-311064 3/10

Twelve years have passed since we last caught a glimpse of thewaterlogged Samara clambering out of the well; twelve years. I want youto remember that because evidently the makers of Rings, the newestinstallment in the series forgot. They forgot that the origin of theirvengeful specter has already been told and the supposed rules ofSamara&#x27;s curse need maybe a refresher at most. Yet given the fact thisfilm simultaneously ups stakes and downplays expectations I have toask, what are we supposed to be looking at: a reboot? A sequel? A spinoff? I can&#x27;t honestly tell you what we&#x27;re supposed to be watching, butwhat it looks like is a really s***ty horror movie &#x96; one that plumforgot to bring the scary. Jump scares abound in this movie and ifthat&#x27;s all it takes to jolt you out of your seat then watch out for theloud claps of car doors closing and umbrellas bursting open. Otherwisethe second scariest thing about this movie is it makes an entire ruralGeorgia town look like the McPoyles from It&#x27;s Always Sunny(2005-Present).<br><br>After an absurd opening hook provided by the single worst in-flightmovie ever, the film begins with a young teenage couple inexplicablyagog about the legend of Orpheus. Male Meatbag #1 (Roe) is headed offto college leaving Female Meatbag #1 (Ingrid Lutz) to wait for theinevitable turkey drop back in their hometown. The film insinuatesshe&#x27;s taking care of a sick family member but we never see them and theplot thread drops as soon as Male Meatbag #1 stops answering his phone.Female Meatbag #1 becomes upset and makes her way to the guy&#x27;s collegewhere we meet (or rather re-meet) Male Meatbag #2 (Galecki). #2 is abiology professor who in addition to barely teaching classes alsosomehow managed to start an experimental death cult to protect himselffrom the cursed tape he recently found. Male Meatbag #1 is involved;Female Meatbag #1 sees the video, Female Meatbag #2 (Teegarden) diesand we all go on a glorious adventure to stop our flat screens fromattacking.<br><br>The main problem that every film in the Ring Series (2002-Present) hasto try to overcome is finding a second act that matters. The conceptall but requires the main source of fright and threat to bookend anarrative dead zone whereby victims anxiously await their fates. TheRing (2002) accomplished this with an engaging mystery. The characterswere given a clear time clock, elevated stakes and clues within thecursed video to give the audience something to play with.<br><br>Rings attempts the same thing, but since the audience should have somecontext (again it&#x27;s been twelve years), we&#x27;re all just twiddling ourthumbs waiting for the characters to catch up. The mystery is aslightly different take on the curse (it&#x27;s also a slightly differentvideo), but it hardly justifies this airless, soulless cash grab.Especially since the Gothic atmosphere of the first is completelyabsent and all we&#x27;re left with to mull on is a late appearance byVincent D&#x27;Onofrio.<br><br>For what it&#x27;s worth, supporting players Vincent D&#x27;Onofrio and JohnnyGalecki outshine the leads in this insipid film like rusted tin cans ina rubbish tip. They&#x27;re not by any means good, but they wisely play totheir strengths unlike Ingrid Lutz who looks like she&#x27;s about to bursta blood vessel trying to fake an American accent. Of course incomparison to Roe, she actually looks like she&#x27;s trying to sell herrole. Roe ambles onto the screen like a last place relay racer whosuddenly decided &#x22;I just don&#x27;t give a f*** anymore.&#x22; This film is aredundant farce lacking any of the inspiration that made the firstAmerican remake not just good but a J-horror trendsetter. The chillsand thrills are non-existent and story can&#x27;t help but flounder in a seaof inattention and indecision. What is Rings supposed to be? I honestlythink it might just be a bad joke twelve years in the making.

Read More
Read more IMDb reviews

Torrent Related

Torrent Trackers for 1080p

http://explodie.org:6969/announce

http://tracker.tfile.me/announce

http://bigfoot1942.sektori.org:6969/announce

udp://eddie4.nl:6969/announce

udp://tracker4.piratux.com:6969/announce

udp://tracker.trackerfix.com:80/announce

udp://tracker.pomf.se:80/announce

udp://torrent.gresille.org:80/announce

udp://9.rarbg.me:2710/announce

udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969/announce

udp://glotorrents.pw:6969/announce

udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce

udp://tracker.blackunicorn.xyz:6969/announce

udp://tracker.internetwarriors.net:1337/announce

udp://p4p.arenabg.ch:1337/announce

udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969/announce

udp://9.rarbg.to:2710/announce

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80/announce

udp://glotorrents.pw:6969/announce

udp://tracker.publicbt.com:80/announce

http://tracker.publicbt.com/announce

http://tracker.trackerfix.com/announce

udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce

udp://9.rarbg.me:2710/announce

udp://9.rarbg.to:2710/announce

Torrent Files for 1080p

RARBG.mp4 [1016764.00]

RARBG.txt [30.00]

Rings.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.mp4 [2085955342.00]

Rings.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.nfo [4014.00]

Subs\Rings.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.idx [81609.00]

Subs\Rings.2017.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.sub [10065920.00]

Torrent Trackers for 720p

http://explodie.org:6969/announce

http://tracker.tfile.me/announce

http://bigfoot1942.sektori.org:6969/announce

udp://eddie4.nl:6969/announce

udp://tracker4.piratux.com:6969/announce

udp://tracker.trackerfix.com:80/announce

udp://tracker.pomf.se:80/announce

udp://torrent.gresille.org:80/announce

udp://9.rarbg.me:2710/announce

udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969/announce

udp://glotorrents.pw:6969/announce

udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce

udp://tracker.blackunicorn.xyz:6969/announce

udp://tracker.internetwarriors.net:1337/announce

udp://p4p.arenabg.ch:1337/announce

udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969/announce

udp://9.rarbg.to:2710/announce

udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80/announce

udp://glotorrents.pw:6969/announce

udp://tracker.publicbt.com:80/announce

http://tracker.publicbt.com/announce

http://tracker.trackerfix.com/announce

udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce

udp://9.rarbg.me:2710/announce

udp://9.rarbg.to:2710/announce

Torrent Files for 720p

RARBG.mp4 [1016764.00]

RARBG.txt [30.00]

Rings.2017.720p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.mp4 [1323108083.00]

Rings.2017.720p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.nfo [4013.00]

Subs\Rings.2017.720p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.idx [81609.00]

Subs\Rings.2017.720p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG.sub [10065920.00]